Supervised Treadmill Walking, Calf Muscle Capillarization and Walking Distance

Effects of supervised treadmill walking training on calf muscle capillarization in patients with intermittent claudication. Angiology. 2009 Feb-Mar;60(1):36-41. Wang J, Zhou S, Bronks R, Graham J, Myers S.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of supervised treadmill walking training on the calf muscle capillarization in patients with intermittent claudication. The first 12-week period was a non-exercise, within-subject control stage, and the second 12-week period was an exercise training stage. Calf muscle biopsy and functional capacity measurement were performed at baseline, preexercise and postexercise training. In all, 11 subjects completed all procedures. Their average age was (mean +/- standard deviation) 73.9 +/- 5.5 years and resting ankle-to-brachial systolic blood pressure index was 0.57 +/- 0.11. After exercise training, the difference between the pretraining and posttraining capillaries in contact with type IIx and IIa muscle fibers for each subject was significantly correlated with an improved pain-free walking time, r = 0.69 and r = 0.62 (both P < .05), respectively. This finding suggests that the change in calf muscle capillarization might contribute to the improved walking capacity following supervised treadmill walking training in patients with intermittent claudication.

My comments:

The protocol in this paper was as follows;

  • Start on treadmill at 3.2 kph (2 mph) with incline individualized to get ⅘ (moderate) claudication pain after 5 minutes
  • Sit and rest after pain reaches ⅘ and begin walking again after pain fully subsides
  • Increase incline 0.5 % if patient is able to walk 7 minutes continuously
  • Start increasing speed 0.5 kph after patient works to 5% grade
  • 1 hour per day, 3 times per week for 12 weeks

5 point pain scale slightly different than 4 point scale of other researchers (why everyone can’t just use regular 10 point scale I’ll never know)

  1. no pain
  2. onset of pain
  3. mild pain
  4. moderate pain
  5. max claudication (pain)

This study found capillaries in contact with each muscle fiber increased significantly for type II (fast, anaerobic) muscle fibers but not type 1 (slow, aerobic) fibers to total muscle fibers. Absolute capillary contact number did increase for all fibers, just not significantly, but I expect it would have if there were a greater number of study subjects. Percent increase in capillary contact was 9.7% for type 1 muscle fibers, 9.2% for type IIa fibers, and 15% for type IIx fibers.

Pain free walking distance (PFWD) improved from 130 m to 348 m (168%), while maximal walking distance (MWD) improved from 323 m to 714 m (120%). In an effort to compare apples to apples I’m going to take these percentages per week and percentages per workout. So for this study that works out to:

  • PFWD/week = 14%
  • MWD/week = 10%
  • PFWD/workout (60 minutes) = 4.67%
  • MWD/workout (60 minutes) = 3.33%

I think the goal should be to find the protocol the most improvement in the least time with the least pain. This protocol is what I started my 1st claudication patient on. He reported it felt pretty good, in that he could stop when it hurt but then he could go at it again when he felt better. At the beginning of his hour he lasted almost exactly 5 minutes but he worked up to 7 minutes by the end of the hour, which he thought was pretty encouraging. The protocol above is also very similar to the TASC II program. The main difference is that intensity is increased after one is able to walk 7 minutes continuously rather than 10 minutes in the TASK II program, but I would be surprised if it made much difference either way.  Improvements per week and per workout were not as good as the interval protocol with active rest, however.  

Thanks for reading my blog. If you have any questions or comments (even hostile ones) please don’t hesitate to ask/share. If you’re reading one of my older blogs, perhaps unrelated to neck or back pain, and it helps you, please remember Spinal Flow Yoga for you or someone you know in the future.


Chad Reilly is a Physical Therapist, obtaining his Master’s in Physical Therapy from Northern Arizona University. He graduated Summa Cum Laude with a B.S. Exercise Science also from NAU. He is a Certified Strength and Conditioning Specialist, and holds a USA Weightlifting Club Coach Certification as well as a NASM Personal Training Certificate. Chad completed his Yoga Teacher Training at Sampoorna Yoga in Goa, India.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Hello! Thanks for checking out Spinal Flow Yoga®!

This is one of my older “legacy” blogs from my prior physical therapy site. If the information you find here seems only moderately related, or a bit technical for yoga, it’s because I wrote it with a different, but still overlapping, audience in mind. However, I think each blog does showcase my thought processes and research base, both of which very much influenced what evolved into Spinal Flow Yoga®.

Further, given that spine pain has long been a favorite topic of mine, much of the content within these older blogs will be directly relevant to Spinal Flow® even if at times I criticized yoga. In fact, that’s why I created Spinal Flow Yoga®, to correct what were, and still are, many physical problems in modern yoga sequences. Time permitting, I may revisit some of my favorites blogs add some content relating them to newer Spinal Flow® concepts that aim to cure neck and back pain as well as improve overall health and fitness from the comfort of your own home without the need for equipment. Hopefully that will make more sense out of why this blog is here. And if you have neck or back pain, you're in luck. Before you needed a gym to utilize my methods, but I've been working hard, gearing it towards home training, and efficiency and effectiveness have been remarkable. Hit the button to learn more about SC5 and SF5, my 5-minute flows, both of which I'm very proud of.