In cluster headache, neuromodulation is offered when patients are refractory to pharmacological prophylaxis. Non-invasive peripheral neuromodulatory approaches are of interest. We will focus on these and particularly on nociception specific, transcutaneous supraorbital nerve stimulation.
In a study using the nociception specific blink reflex, we made a serendipitous discovery, notably the potential prophylactic effect of bilateral, time contingent, nociception specific, transcutaneous stimulation of the supraorbital nerve.
We report on a case series of seven cluster headache patients, in whom attacks seemed to disappear during repeated stimulation of the supraorbital nerves. Three patients stopped experiencing attacks since study participation.
Bilateral, time contingent, nociception specific, transcutaneous supraorbital nerve stimulation may have a prophylactic effect in episodic and chronic cluster headache. Given its limited side effects and its non-invasive nature, further studies to investigate this potential peripheral neuromodulatory approach for both episodic and chronic cluster headache are warranted.
“The ‘gate-control theory’ of Melzack and Wall deals with the influence of a competition between nociceptive and innocuous signals on second-order neurons (10-11), the latter signals transmitted by A-beta fibers. One may question the applicability of this theory to NSTS of the supraorbital nerve, in which nociception specific stimulation of trigeminal A-delta afferents seem to suppress the transmission of the other nociceptive (i.e. headache) signal on a segmental level.”
The parameters used were monophasic 200 Hz train of three 0.5 ms pulses, working up to 2.1 mA given on average 6 times at 2 hour intervals. They were using a type of electrical current they wanted to be painful and testing for a blink response. It was serendipity that they found the cluster headaches went away. Cluster headaches are a particularly painful and problematic variety, so it is good to see potential here from a treatment that is non-invasive and at least in this small sample seems to have worked quite well.
I generally favor alternating current to the monophasic current used in this study, largely because it feels better. However, it certainly is an interesting finding and should perhaps be compared to alternating currents being applied transcutaneously to the supraorbital nerve. I would like to see how it compares to suboccipital stimulation, as well as to the combination of the two for cluster headaches, migraines, tension, and cervicogenic headaches. I have been noticing a very good effect with the latter three. It is also interesting that the headache prevention may not be due to gate-control theory.
Thanks for reading my blog. If you have any questions or comments (even hostile ones) please don’t hesitate to ask/share. If you’re reading one of my older blogs, perhaps unrelated to neck or back pain, and it helps you, please remember Spinal Flow Yoga for you or someone you know in the future.
Chad Reilly is a Physical Therapist, obtaining his Master’s in Physical Therapy from Northern Arizona University. He graduated Summa Cum Laude with a B.S. Exercise Science also from NAU. He is a Certified Strength and Conditioning Specialist, and holds a USA Weightlifting Club Coach Certification as well as a NASM Personal Training Certificate. Chad completed his Yoga Teacher Training at Sampoorna Yoga in Goa, India.