Effects of electrical stimulation of vastus medialis obliquus muscle in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome: an electromyographic analysis. Garcia FR1, Azevedo FM, Alves N, Carvalho AC, Padovani CR, Negrão Filho RF. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2010 Nov-Dec;14(6):477-82.
The use of surface electromyography (SEMG) has been considered a tool for quantitative assessment of patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS). Conservative treatments aim to improve patellar alignment, and electrical stimulation of the vastus medialis obliquus (VMO) muscle has been considered effective because it is selective and does not cause joint irritation.
This study aims to investigate the efficiency of a muscle strengthening program with electrical stimulation of the VMO muscle in PFPS by SEMG.
A group of ten young women (age: 23.1 ± 4.9 years; body mass: 66.8 ± 14.0 kg; height: 1.63 ± 6.9 cm; BMI: 25.1 ± 5.6 kg/m²) with unilateral PFPS participated in the study. They performed the functional test of stair stepping to capture the electromyographic (EMG) activity of the VMO and vastus lateralis (VL) muscles, before and after a program of electrical stimulation of the VMO muscle. The electrical stimulation was performed three times per week for six weeks. For an analysis between the VMO and VL muscles, we considered the variables: ratio of time of onset to peak of activation, ratio of the integrals of the signals (t-test for dependent samples), and any difference between onsets of activation (Wilcoxon test), with a significance level of p < 0.05.
The results only showed change in behavior in the EMG signal for the ratio of the integrals of the signals, indicating that changes occurred in the force-generating capacity of the muscle after the training.
The use of electrical stimulation should be considered to complement the conservative therapeutic approach in patients with PFPS, and the analysis of the ratio of the integrals of the SEMG signals should be considered as an instrument of evaluation.
I’m not a fan of attempting to selectively strengthen the VMO (oblique fibers of the vastus medialis) for patellofemoral pain. The idea is that by doing so, it will help the patella track more medially and thus decreasing stress on lateral structures. The reason I’m not a fan is due to reading study after study, there is an indication that it’s pretty much impossible to preferentially recruit the VMO with exercise. As a physical therapist I hear about it all the time, and though the VMO might help pull the knee medial, when you do exercise the brain activates all aspects of the quads, lateral as well as medial. Exercises attempting to tweak the balance towards the medial by turning the toes out, coactivating the hip adductors, etc. just don’t pull it off. If any exercise does make a percent of difference between VM or VMO vs. vastus lateralis (VL) activation ratios, they generally do so by making the entire quadriceps EMG decrease. That said, electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) is different. You put EMS electrodes on a portion of a large muscle like the quadriceps and that portion of the muscle will contract to the exclusion of the rest. It’s plainly evident if you try it on yourself, which is what I think every physical therapist should do.
This study tested the EMS theory out to see if doing so would get the VMO to activate earlier, which it did not. However, it did make the VMO activate stronger after training with EMS 3 times per week for 6 weeks. Such that the electromyographic signal ratio of the VMO/VL increased from 0.89 to 1.82, which is pretty substantial. Whether this helps to decrease patellofemoral pain is another matter that was not tested, as it appears that the primary muscle weakness seen with patellofemoral pain isn’t quadriceps, but rather at the hip. Still it makes me think that if I’m going to put some number of EMS electrodes on the quadriceps, at least one of them is going to be on the vastus medialis. I was doing that most of the time already, but until I have a better idea, I figure I’ll do it all the time now.
EMS parameters used in this study were as follows:
- Waveform: asymmetric bipolar
- Frequency: 50 Hz
- Pulse duration: 500 US
- Treatment duration: 7 minutes
- Duty Cycle and treatment duration: 6 sec on 12 sec off for 7 minutes, progressing to 10 sec on 20 sec off for 30 minutes.
- mA: “maximum intensity the participant could bear, without pain during contraction”
Those are not the parameters I would use but they seemed pretty effective anyway. One of the downsides of EMS research is that parameters used are all over the place, with certain guidelines emerging as good, but still lots of exceptions. The bright side is that more often than not, the exceptions from the norm still work.
As always, if you have any further questions or need for clarifications, please don’t hesitate to ask. Being aware that some of my blog ideas are contentious and occasionally a bit out of the field of my expertise, I encourage my readers to come forth with any questions/comments that are of interest or concern. Your comments are valued and welcomed.
Chad Reilly is a licensed physical therapist, located in North Phoenix, practicing science based medicine with treatment protocols unique and effective enough to proudly serve patients from Phoenix, Scottsdale, Mesa, Chandler, Tempe, Peoria, and Glendale.