Electric Stimulation Decreases/Eliminates Painful Neuropathy

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy: amelioration of pain with transcutaneous electrostimulation. Diabetes Care. 1997 Nov;20(11):1702-5. Kumar D, Marshall HJ.

Abstract
OBJECTIVE:
To evaluate the efficacy of transcutaneous electrotherapy for chronic painful peripheral neuropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS:
Thirty-one patients with symptoms and signs of peripheral neuropathy were randomized to the electrotherapy or sham treatment (control) group. The electrostimulation was given by a portable unit (H-Wave machine) than generated a biphasic, exponentially decaying waveform (pulse width 4 ms, 25-35 V, > or = 2 Hz). Patients treated each of their lower extremities for 30 min daily for 4 weeks at home. Nine patients from the sham-treatment group participated for a second period, during which all of them received the active electrotherapy. Patient’s degree of pain and discomfort was graded on a scale of 0 to 5.
RESULTS:
In the sham-treated group (n = 13), the neuropathic symptoms improved in five (38%) patients, and the pain score declined from 2.92 +/- 0.13 to 2.38 +/- 0.26 (P < 0.04), suggesting a procedure-related placebo effect. In the electrotherapy group (n = 18), symptomatic improvement was seen in 15 (83%) cases, 3 of which were completely asymptomatic; the pain score declined from 3.17 +/- 0.12 to 1.44 +/- 0.25 (P < 0.01) and the posttreatment pain scores were considerably lower (P < 0.03), indicating a substantial treatment effect over and above any placebo influence. Patients in the electrotherapy group reported greater reduction in symptoms (52 +/- 7% vs. 27 +/- 10% in control subjects, P < 0.05) on an analog scale. Moreover, the electrotherapy decreased pain scores (from 3.0 +/- 0.62 to 1.56 +/- 0.32, P < 0.02) in nine patients who had received sham treatment earlier.
CONCLUSIONS:
A form of transcutaneous electrotherapy ameliorated the pain and discomfort associated with peripheral neuropathy. This novel modality offers a potential non-pharmacological treatment option.

My comments:

This study didn’t look at function but rather attempted to lessen/eliminate pain in patients with the painful form of neuropathy (some patients don’t hurt but only have numbness). As noted in the abstract, 83% of those treated with electric stimulation improved and 17% became completely asymptomatic.

Parameters used in the study were:

  • Waveform:  biphasic exponentially decaying
  • Duty Cycle:  continuous (I think)
  • Pulse Duration:  400 uS
  • Intensity:  35 mA (max)
  • Rate:  user adjustable from 2-70 Hz
  • Treatment Length:  30 minutes
  • Training Frequency:  Daily
  • Training Length:  4 weeks
  • Electrodes:  4 electrodes; 2 placed on the distal quadriceps, 1 on the neck of the fibula and 1 centered gastrocnemius muscle (size not given)

My treatments are shorter in duration using biphasic square waveforms and EMS patterns designed to increase strength, but my patients report pain relief similar to the above researchers. The reason I use the EMS strength protocols is because they have been found to be better than TENS at decreasing pain.  For neuropathy, I really want to try to not just decrease pain but also increase muscle mass to help with function, to elicit strong muscle contractions, and to pump blood into the area in an attempt to improve circulation.  I think all of these things should help with neuropathic pain. Also I use 4 large electrodes (4” circular) and right now prefer to place 2 on the gastrocnemius, 1 on the tibialis anterior, and 1 on the sole of the foot. One thing I notice with my lower extremity neuropathy patients is they often need an especially strong stimulator to get a good muscle contraction. The 35 mA used in this study I expect will decrease pain, but I think they would get better results if they increased their pulse width to 450 mA, and intensity as tolerated up to around 60-70 mA.  Also while I have not tried it yet, I suspect an ideal EMS program would not be just one set of parameters, but rather alternate between 2 or more, with some settings directed at increasing strength, and with others directed more towards improving circulation and cardiovascular benefits.  

The study was only 30 days long, and while my patients usually report immediate relief ongoing treatment seems to continually lessen symptoms. My patient who I am following with regards to increased sensation has been doing the electric stimulation at home every other day for 3 months, and we plan to retest going forward. So I do think home use of a stimulator is ideal because they often pay for themselves quickly and ideal use I would expect to be at least 3 times per week if not daily. So while I frequently do the treatment in my office, a lot of what I do is help patients decide what kind of EMS/TENS machine and accessories they need, help them program the machine, and teach them how to set up the electrodes for home use.

Thanks for reading my blog. If you have any questions or comments (even hostile ones) please don’t hesitate to ask/share. If you’re reading one of my older blogs, perhaps unrelated to neck or back pain, and it helps you, please remember Spinal Flow Yoga for you or someone you know in the future.


Chad Reilly is a Physical Therapist, obtaining his Master’s in Physical Therapy from Northern Arizona University. He graduated Summa Cum Laude with a B.S. Exercise Science also from NAU. He is a Certified Strength and Conditioning Specialist, and holds a USA Weightlifting Club Coach Certification as well as a NASM Personal Training Certificate. Chad completed his Yoga Teacher Training at Sampoorna Yoga in Goa, India.

2 thoughts on “Electric Stimulation Decreases/Eliminates Painful Neuropathy”

  1. Hello, I am doing some research on Neuropathy and ways to decrease the pain. Initially I was looking at TENS units; however, I am now intrigued with your study of EMS and am wondering if you think EMS is a better way to approach neuropathic treatment? Thank you!

    Reply
    • Hi Julie. Yes, I think EMS is absolutely better than TENS. They’re both the same idea, but EMS is more powerful. It’s not necessarily either/or also. With one of the European Globus machines like the “Triathlon” I can write my own parameters and put a TENS “pulse: in between the EMS blasts. Also I would encourage you to read my blog about electrode material. Rubber carbon electrodes makes it far more comfortable to utilize higher levels of current, better able to treat the condiition.

      Reply

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Hello! Thanks for checking out Spinal Flow Yoga®!

This is one of my older “legacy” blogs from my prior physical therapy site. If the information you find here seems only moderately related, or a bit technical for yoga, it’s because I wrote it with a different, but still overlapping, audience in mind. However, I think each blog does showcase my thought processes and research base, both of which very much influenced what evolved into Spinal Flow Yoga®.

Further, given that spine pain has long been a favorite topic of mine, much of the content within these older blogs will be directly relevant to Spinal Flow® even if at times I criticized yoga. In fact, that’s why I created Spinal Flow Yoga®, to correct what were, and still are, many physical problems in modern yoga sequences. Time permitting, I may revisit some of my favorites blogs add some content relating them to newer Spinal Flow® concepts that aim to cure neck and back pain as well as improve overall health and fitness from the comfort of your own home without the need for equipment. Hopefully that will make more sense out of why this blog is here. And if you have neck or back pain, you're in luck. Before you needed a gym to utilize my methods, but I've been working hard, gearing it towards home training, and efficiency and effectiveness have been remarkable. Hit the button to learn more about SC5 and SF5, my 5-minute flows, both of which I'm very proud of.